BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Research on Research - ECPv6.9.1//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://researchonresearch.org
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Research on Research
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:UTC
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:UTC
DTSTART:20240101T000000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20241111T130000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20241111T143000
DTSTAMP:20250708T065102
CREATED:20250117T110100Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250128T110759Z
UID:2136-1731330000-1731335400@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Using Natural Language Processing (NLP) in classification of Social Sciences and Humanities research and societal impact
DESCRIPTION:The European Network for Research Evaluation in the Social Sciences and the Humanities (ENRESSH) in partnership with the Research on Research Institute (RoRI) is proud to present the next webinar in its series on research evaluation as it is practiced across disciplines and countries. \n\n\n\nWe are opening a new thematic line on AI in research assessment with the presentation of two classification exercises using Natural Language Processing (NLP). \n\n\n\nMODERATORSpecial advisor Dr Jon Holm\, Research Council of Norway \n\n\n\nSPEAKERSTopic modeling of SSH publications from the VABB publication databaseSenior researcher Dr Raf Guns\, Flemish Centre for Research & Development Monitoring (ECOOM)\, Antwerp University \n\n\n\nClassifying REF impact cases by user groups – a lexical approachProfessor Andrea Bonaccorsi\, Economics and Management at the School of Engineering of the University of Pisa \n\n\n\nRESPONDENTDr Denis Newman-Griffis Lecturer in Data Science\, University of Sheffield\, and a Research Fellow of the Research on Research Institute \n\n\n\nSPEAKERS\n\n\n\nRaf Guns (he) is a senior researcher at the University of Antwerp\, where he coordinates the Antwerp branch of the Flemish Centre for Research & Development Monitoring (ECOOM). His research focuses on quantitative science studies\, addressing topics like interdisciplinarity\, open science\, and the characteristics of the social sciences and humanities. \n\n\n\nAndrea Bonaccorsi (he) is a Professor of Economics and Management at the School of Engineering of the University of Pisa. His main areas of research are economics of science and innovation. With more than 200 works\, he is listed in the top 2% of world scientists. \n\n\n\nDenis Newman-Griffis(they/them) is a Lecturer in Data Science at the University of Sheffield\, a Research Fellow of the Research on Research Institute\, and a British Academy Innovation Fellow. Their research investigates the principles and practices of Responsible AI\, focusing on health and disability as well as public sector governance. They lead the Research on Research Institute’s GRAIL project on Responsible AI and Machine Learning for research funding and evaluation\, and they are an active participant in Responsible AI policy discussions in research\, education\, and government. \n\n\n\nRegister on Eventbrite.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/using-natural-language-processing-nlp-in-classification-of-social-sciences-and-humanities-research-and-societal-impact/
CATEGORIES:Online,Research Evaluation
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/natural-language-processing-spiral-of-letters-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250319T150000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250319T160000
DTSTAMP:20250708T065102
CREATED:20250217T152217Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250217T152451Z
UID:2209-1742396400-1742400000@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Do Grant Proposal Texts Matter for Funding Decisions? A Field Experiment
DESCRIPTION:19 March 2025 08:00 PDT  / 15:00 GMT / 16:00 CET \n\n\n\nScientists and funding agencies invest considerable resources in writing and evaluating grant proposals. But do grant proposal texts noticeably change panel decisions in single blind review? \n\n\n\nWe report on a field experiment conducted by The Dutch Research Council (NWO) in collaboration with the authors in an early-career competition for awards of 800\,000 euros of research funding. A random half of panelists were shown a CV and only a one-paragraph summary of the proposed research\, while the other half were shown a CV and a full proposal. We find that withholding proposal texts from panelists did not detectibly impact their proposal rankings. This result suggests that the resources devoted to writing and evaluating grant proposals may not have their intended effect of facilitating the selection of the most promising science. \n\n\n\n \n\n\n\nAbout the Speaker\n\n\n\n\nMüge Simsek is an Assistant Professor of Sociology in the programme group Institutions\, Inequalities and Life Courses at the University of Amsterdam. She earned her PhD from Utrecht University in 2019 and completed postdoctoral research at both Utrecht University and the Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute. Prior to her current role\, she worked as a lecturer at University College Groningen. Her research centers on the integration processes of immigrants and their offspring\, with a particular emphasis on the role of religion. In parallel\, she maintains a secondary research agenda focused on the organization of science and inequality within academia.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/do-grant-proposal-texts-matter-for-funding-decisions-a-field-experiment/
CATEGORIES:Experiments
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/pexels-pixabay-87611-scaled.jpg
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=UTC:20250630T080000
DTEND;TZID=UTC:20250707T170000
DTSTAMP:20250708T065102
CREATED:20250117T105614Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20250128T110758Z
UID:2135-1751270400-1751907600@researchonresearch.org
SUMMARY:Metascience 2025 Conference
DESCRIPTION:Save the Date: \n\n\n\nJune 30 – July 2\, 2025University College London\n\n\n\nAbout \n\n\n\nMany scholarly fields conduct descriptive research about the research process. Advocates and reformers have prescriptive ideas about how the research process might be improved. Policymakers\, funders\, publishers\, and other stakeholders enact changes to the social and technical infrastructure of research. All have an interest in whether changes and reforms have their intended effects or unintended consequences that might accelerate or inhibit advancement\, translation\, and application of research. Together\, these researchers and stakeholders are the research and development pipeline for improving the system and practice of research. The Metascience 2025 Conference will bring these communities together to share ideas\, evidence\, and foster a culture of continuous experimentation and improvement. \n\n\n\nThe Center for Open Science and the Research on Research Institute have partnered to bring the Metascience Conference to London! \n\n\n\nMetascience 2025 will occur in London’s Knowledge Quarter\, with a unique and rich mix of research\, scientific\, and cultural partners\, facilities\, and opportunities centered on a half-mile stretch of London’s Euston Road. RoRI\, based at University College London (UCL)\, will be the lead local coordinating body for a collaborative effort by a consortium of London-based scientific and research institutions.
URL:https://researchonresearch.org/event/metascience-2025-conference/
CATEGORIES:2025
ATTACH;FMTTYPE=image/jpeg:https://researchonresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/07/metascience.jpg
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR